Reduction from OV to Largest Common Subtree
Revision as of 11:19, 15 February 2023 by Admin (talk | contribs) (Created page with "FROM: OV TO: Largest Common Subtree == Description == == Implications == assume: OVH<br/>then: for all constants $d \geq {2}$, target on two rooted trees of size at most $n$, degree $d$, and height $h \leq \log_d n + O(\log \log n)$ cannot be solved in truly subquadtratic $O(n^{2-\epsilon})$ time == Year == 2018 == Reference == Abboud, A., Backurs, A., Hansen, T. D., Vassilevska Williams, V., & Zamir, O. (2018). Subtree isomorphism revisited. ACM Tra...")
FROM: OV TO: Largest Common Subtree
Description
Implications
assume: OVH
then: for all constants $d \geq {2}$, target on two rooted trees of size at most $n$, degree $d$, and height $h \leq \log_d n + O(\log \log n)$ cannot be solved in truly subquadtratic $O(n^{2-\epsilon})$ time
Year
2018
Reference
Abboud, A., Backurs, A., Hansen, T. D., Vassilevska Williams, V., & Zamir, O. (2018). Subtree isomorphism revisited. ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG), 14(3), 1-23.
https://dl-acm-org.ezproxy.canberra.edu.au/doi/pdf/10.1145/3093239